Which counseling approach does not make the Marine accountable for their actions?

The directive counseling approach is characterized by the counselor taking a more authoritative role, where they provide specific guidance and solutions to the issues at hand. In this approach, the focus is largely on the counselor's direction rather than fostering personal accountability in the Marine being counseled. The Marine might feel as if their actions are being dictated and may not engage in a process of self-reflection or responsibility in the same way they would in more collaborative or non-directive approaches.

In contrast, non-directive and collaborative counseling styles encourage personal responsibility and self-assessment. The non-directive method relies on open-ended questions and active listening, allowing the Marine to explore their feelings and thoughts, which inherently promotes ownership of their actions. The collaborative approach involves working together to identify problems and solutions, further emphasizing accountability and mutual engagement.

Active counseling, while involving a hands-on approach, still emphasizes the Marine's involvement in the discussion and decision-making process, providing opportunities for accountability. The directive style stands out as the one that does not foster this ownership due to its more prescriptive nature.